From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 20:17:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9498FB14431 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:6350::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A00E1008 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69FFB9B3 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:17:23 +0300 (MSK) Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) References: <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <5716924C.4060104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:17:16 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFLEwmfEe7dmeRCaTTHRhI58eGfNA04Gs" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:17:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nFLEwmfEe7dmeRCaTTHRhI58eGfNA04Gs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vTwx1iF9m2qK7geu06Natnm0wD8DLWNKP" From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5716924C.4060104@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) References: <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: --vTwx1iF9m2qK7geu06Natnm0wD8DLWNKP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19.04.2016 23:10, K. Macy wrote: I don't like to see, as some participants of this thread write their messages as if somebody in this thread are against packaging base with pk= g. I don't see anybody, who say "remove this packaging code, it is all completely wrong, BS, whatever". All objections are against mechanical splitting base to 700+ packages, not against packaged base per se. --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --vTwx1iF9m2qK7geu06Natnm0wD8DLWNKP-- --nFLEwmfEe7dmeRCaTTHRhI58eGfNA04Gs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXFpJSXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGOTZEMUNBMEI1RjQzMThCNjc0QjMzMEFF QUIwM0M1OEJGREM0NzhGAAoJEOqwPFi/3EePIpYP/3Cze+d5hHMVnGtYHDp3/ehh Ebkc2whZVGmGN7yASOQjOspgEy0B41/TIp76G7KwRcCiuzn2LuKmEsoMTGX/7iVC 4wPxuo8NJfxyjmtC1mfiISO0i4UUcUfIiPz2D4beurpDL9/cmYO7gl52rkPngvnz cwn59hj83NfENle/3kd5jSsBAa6zik0wgDZYBoD4ydYF06U2FFFIVMvio5EdwIRU 6jbMk8+gPpOc8Sz0QRan4bb1K5Wa8/igIXSHkFmK3omA/S44pqxHT3p5u+vF2JzL cf7OR2Hom8vBvg9jy2b5hyMslU14u3UEX23AEair2z90RB5AuSmzOFTCef0wGFZd k17gx04MjHE489lmUJjbWntsyp+JrqQ2PA88DzsmO8ubZfJZFCh0Q8XoZAoJDkG3 BzGJ6n4acSz8CKyyCzCsyzbg28yNXo1hCkFZzkCzcrGOkF68wOsJGFp+PkiF88X8 pGYpuYNMvcnp1OxRkSar0Swt/gujE2xLtyDvz0D8YFQrN/6j3WC2/tO0WhFX/Ei1 QK69KQVY+1XNas2PXKHu5dNIpU8JgMsyCJTlX0dYl/j/4cSaEFSoSR+11IWa5Hzm 6cfOCNcoqjDzaXFCGXtKAUzuwvXm5ukQN3E07+7RQ80Yxs0iynE4O4FBnGv1JVvC mcdvWMlP5O03BtKtDRoq =61TA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFLEwmfEe7dmeRCaTTHRhI58eGfNA04Gs--