From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 08:22:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EACB99649A; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47CD2120C; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCkca-0003Sm-Jf; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:22:24 +0300 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:22:24 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: MS DNS doesn't answer to CURRENT under Hyper-V Message-ID: <20150708082224.GB44094@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20150707130902.GA41189@zxy.spb.ru> <20150707154906.GA44094@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:22:30 -0000 On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:05:39AM +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote: > Ok, r284746 is the root of the problem. MS DNS works under r284745 and > doesn't work under r284746. > Slawa, what should I look at in wireshark output? I think developers can want look at same packet before entering in NIC and after receiving MS DNS server. I.e. hexdump of all packet. FreeBSD's tcpdump do this by `tcpdump -X` for IPv4 payload and `tcpdump -XX` for IPv4 and Ethernet payload (wireshark by default include ethernet, for easy comparasion do same). wireshar do same by 'Export Packet Dissections' 'as plain text' with checked 'Packet Deatils - All expanded' and 'Packet Bytes'. This is will be very verbose output. > 2015-07-07 18:49 GMT+03:00 Slawa Olhovchenkov : > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:04:46PM +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote: > > > >> Well, turning off checksum offloading by `ifconfig hn0 -txcsum > >> -rxcsum` definitely helps. > >> > >> As for tcpdump I'm not completely sure if I did it right, but I see > >> "bad udp cksum" phrase: > >> > >> # tcpdump -i hn0 -vvv -nn udp dst port 53 > >> tcpdump: listening on hn0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size > >> 262144 bytes > >> 18:01:19.139994 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 61218, offset 0, flags [none], > >> proto UDP (17), length 51) > >> 192.168.25.26.45683 > 192.168.25.3.53: [bad udp cksum 0xb39e -> > >> 0xf210!] 52886+ A? ya.ru. (23) > >> 18:01:24.140544 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 17293, offset 0, flags [none], > >> proto UDP (17), length 51) > >> 192.168.25.26.12575 > 192.168.25.3.53: [bad udp cksum 0xb39e -> > >> 0x7365!] 52886+ A? ya.ru. (23) > > > > tcpdump "bad udp cksum" is normal on FreeBSD host in case checksum > > offload (and may be need only for help finding issuse in code). Need > > wireshark capturing from MS DNS host (or from mirroring port).