From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 25 16:40:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA10384 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:40:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arh0300.urh.uiuc.edu (arh0300.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.72.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA10331 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dannyman@arh0300.urh.uiuc.edu) Received: (from dannyman@localhost) by arh0300.urh.uiuc.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) id SAA26318; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:40:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19980225184048.54707@urh.uiuc.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:40:48 -0600 From: dannyman To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: qcam in kernel - build died Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu X-URL: http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/djhoward/ Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello. I noticed the QuickCam support was recently pulled. That's cool since it didn't work. When I went to compile my new kernel, it config'ed just fine, but then the compiling failed because it was trying to hit the quickcam stuff somewhere. I commented out the qcam stuff and everything worked fine. I'm just wondering if maybe config should be complaining about qcam being missing, instead of the build failing. Maybe someone overlooked something, or maybe things are s'posed to work this way, I just figured I'd call a head's up. :) dan -- //Dan -=- This message brought to you by djhoward@uiuc.edu -=- \\/yori -=- Information - http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/djhoward/ -=- aiokomete -=- Our Honored Symbol deserves an Honorable Retirement To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message