From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 01:51:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6820E16A4CF; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 01:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294E343FA3; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 01:51:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])hAA9pYU29666; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:51:34 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:51:34 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20031110094330.GA8458@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20031110104611.U29745@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <200311100853.hAA8rchS095414@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031110103409.R29745@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20031110094330.GA8458@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bsnmp - Imported sources X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hartmut Brandt List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:51:39 -0000 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK>On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: KK> KK>> KK>What is this? I don't remember it being discussed on the mailing KK>> KK>lists, which is usual before importing new software into FreeBSD. KK>> KK>> That is the base for the NgATM ILMI daemon. While writing the commit KK>> message I was thinking about whether or not to include an explanation into KK>> the commit message. We talked about this on the atm mailing list approx. a KK>> year ago. KK> KK>That's pretty narrow distribution, and self-selected for people who KK>think it's a good idea. Well, discussing ATM issues with folks who don't care about ATM doesn't make much sense though. The best you get is no response at all. If the problem is that it is in contrib - the reason is that although the development platform is FreeBSD this is actually portable code that runs also on Solaris and Linux and has a different build environment for this (gmake and autoconfig). harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org