From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 03:58:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034C716A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:58:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840A343D48 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:58:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so26085rnf for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:58:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MY3rmtj+vgIAmf8GULfDATZCE4ABClu/Xagl4fkieQn2GrmozYKiApuK8DelInfk5ZelAXDQAbr+7XZIGXQkKwsGKybcnx92eSrIV2zj6hNsw8WNCk99gZWGiuhYjlhHwSUc55KkmFKDzyX6QtgId3zsE7lOJyq5AyaBx8NvpHI= Received: by 10.38.101.54 with SMTP id y54mr113650rnb; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:58:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.104.14 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:58:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7579f7fb050215195866fbecc1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:58:25 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <42128E4A.8080101@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050215215908.GA1012@schweikhardt.net> <7579f7fb05021515227e7b8539@mail.gmail.com> <42128E4A.8080101@samsco.org> cc: FreeBSD SCSI cc: mjacob@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cam_xpt.c 1.147 makes system hang at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:58:27 -0000 > > Well, my guess is that the U160 drives the posted has are going to have > a fairly high ANSI rev number already. No, they're SCSI-3, not SCSI-4. > Let's just dig in and fix this > for real. That's not going to happen this week. > > Btw, does anyone by change have access to a bus scanner to see what > Windows or Solaris does when scanning LUNs? I don't need one- I have target virtualization. Both Windows && Solaris use REPORT LUNS for Fibre Channel. I don't remember what either do for SPI- nothing really that interesting.