From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 21 19:38:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA19885 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 19:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA19880 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 19:38:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id LAA19433; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:38:01 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:38:01 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: denis cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dynamically Allocatable Name Service (DANS) In-Reply-To: <31CAEEE1.7E3459D9@actcom.co.il> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [Cross-posts trimmed] On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, denis wrote: > Hi, folks. > > The idea I would like to propose is not platform dependent or > something, The reason I addressed it to all those lists in the > header is my desire to gain more auditory. > > I want to write a name server with dynamical updates and all > binary database. (Actually I'm writing it) I know, that there is > dynamical updates support in the existing BIND distribution, but > it seems to me like fixing a rocket motor to the bike. What binary database has enough performance to handle names on the Internet? I don't think even db will do. -mike hancock