From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 3 13: 6:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gscamnlm03.wr.usgs.gov (gscamnlm03.wr.usgs.gov [130.118.4.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D65E37B401; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:06:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsowders@usgs.gov) To: John Polstra Cc: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help! MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Robert L Sowders" Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:06:34 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on gscamnlm03/SERVER/USGS/DOI(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 07/03/2001 01:06:36 PM, Serialize complete at 07/03/2001 01:06:36 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Polstra Sent by: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG 07/03/2001 08:46 AM =20 To: stable@freebsd.org cc: rsowders@usgs.gov Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help! In article , Robert L Sowders wrote: > I took a look at the cvsweb and=20 > noticed that mfs=5Fvfsops.c was marked as removed at version 1.93 4 weeks= =20 > ago by phk, >>It was removed in -current, but not in -stable. A file in CVS can >>exist in some branches but not in others. > but two weeks ago version 181 was added and updated by 1.82=20 > but the dates are backwards on the versions. Screwy eh? >>That is not what I see when I look at cvsweb or use "cvs log". > There was a commit to the mfs=5Fvfsops.c file done on Jun 17, that may=20 have=20 > been kinda screwy, or maybe it's just the cvs system. >>That commit was on the RELENG=5F4 branch (-stable), where the file is >>still alive. Nothing screwy there. Ah, that would be my bleary eyes at 3 AM. Didn't realize the branch=20 point. > version 1.81 is marked as occuring on Jun 17, 2001 and version 1.82 > occurred at Apr 15 2000. >>I don't know where you saw that. CVSWeb shows a date of Dec 19, >>1999 for revision 1.81 and Apr 15, 2000 for revision 1.82. That >>agrees with what is recorded in the actual RCS file. Uh-excuse the shorthand, I meant to say 1.81.2.1, and it is dated Jun 17,=20 2001 > I'm not sure if cvsup uses the date or the version when it's supping > files, >>If you are asking for the -stable branch with "tag=3DRELENG=5F4" then >>CVSup uses the version. > Checking my srcs locally it appears that indeed my cvsup pulled > version 1.81.2.1 dated 2001/06/17 which is wrong and does not have > the add in version 1.82. >>That is exactly what CVSup should have done. Revision 1.82 is not >>a part of -stable; it is in -current only. -stable was branched at >>revision 1.81, before revision 1.82 was created. For -stable, the >>revision after 1.81 is 1.81.2.1. Next will come 1.81.2.2, etc. And that's exactly what happened 24 minutes and 12 seconds ago. Now it's=20 clear. As you are. My eyes like sails, unfurled they are. > I wonder how many other things are screwy in the cvs repository? >>I don't see anything screwy there. :-) >>John Apparently the only thing screwy in the cvs repository, was me at 3am. ;-) = --=20 John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington=20 USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Ch=F6gyam=20 Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message