From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 27 00:23:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9E216A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:23:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CED343D46
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:23:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from [192.160.235.2] (cs242746-26.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.26])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB13C148D7
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:23:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:21:29 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <20041026150002.GB69903@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041026150002.GB69903@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200410261921.29249.linimon@lonesome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] comms/ltmdm update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:23:53 -0000

If I didn't say so already (and forgot ...)

sending patches to the list tends to get them lost in all the
discussion.  Using GNATS, while certainly not a flawless solution,
at least allows for issues to be tracked rather than just lost.

Thanks,
mcl