Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:23:36 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Thomas Mueller <mueller230@insightbb.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang? Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=DEtqKgxA=psYYwNu0CwpghS_a0my9dJwZpGmTz63a1w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <FC.A2.28005.090BEDF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> References: <FC.A2.28005.090BEDF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 June 2012 21:37, Thomas Mueller <mueller230@insightbb.com> wrote: > What is the current status of Clang vs. GCC as default compiler for ports and for > "make buildworld" and "make buildkernel" in HEAD and 9.0-STABLE? http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang > Now one concern is wine not working when Clang is used to "make buildworld". This isn't good. Can you please follow up with more debugging information? (gdb backtrace with debugging symbols enabled) > I see from reading the emailing lists that the intention is to make Clang the default (or only?) compiler suite for 10.0-RELEASE. Yes. > I realize that still leaves much time to work out many of the bugs. We need your help though. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=DEtqKgxA=psYYwNu0CwpghS_a0my9dJwZpGmTz63a1w>