Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 16:37:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Spike Gronim <spork@cncn.com> To: "Mike O'Brien" <obrien@rush.aero.org> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec 1542 vs. 2940 geometries? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980428163655.244B-100000@pigstuy> In-Reply-To: <199804272106.OAA04938@anpiel.aero.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Mike O'Brien wrote: > Do the Adaptec 1542 and the 2940 translate disk geometries differently? > My 1542 died and, not having a spare, we plugged a 2940 into the machine. It > didn't seem to work too well (like, things went nuts after trying to start the > boot program) so we were wondering if the 1542 and the 2940 use different disk > geometry translations? > > Mike O'Brien > The 2940 uses a different driver than the 1542. Are you running a custom kernel? try booting kernel.GENERIC -Spike Gronim spork@cncn.com "Hacker, n: One who hacks real good" --Computer Contradictionary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980428163655.244B-100000>