From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  2 02:41:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2114316A4CE; Wed,  2 Mar 2005 02:41:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E6F8B43D4C; Wed,  2 Mar 2005 02:41:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from brooks@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (brooks@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j222fcKL046495;
	Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:41:38 GMT
	(envelope-from brooks@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from brooks@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j222fcil046491;
	Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:41:38 GMT
	(envelope-from brooks)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:41:38 GMT
From: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200503020241.j222fcil046491@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: risky@stabilis.ru, brooks@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/67545: [nfs] NFS Diskless Mount Option Suggestion
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 02:41:39 -0000

Synopsis: [nfs] NFS Diskless Mount Option Suggestion

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: brooks
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 2 02:40:53 GMT 2005
State-Changed-Why: 
FreeBSD 5.2 has an implementation of rpc.lockd.  Is there any reasion
why enabling it is not a viable solution here?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=67545