From owner-freebsd-scsi Thu Feb 28 12:11:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.yumyumyum.org (dsl092-171-091.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.171.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C34837B417 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1854 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Feb 2002 20:11:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 20:11:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:11:23 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Culver To: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Cc: "Kenneth D. Merry" , Julian Elischer , Thomas Quinot , , Subject: Re: Updated ATAPI/CAM patches In-Reply-To: <200202281926.g1SJQpa78108@freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20020228150805.T1827-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hmm, why do we need to add new layers and loss of functionality > to the ATAPI devices ? Many many many people would like to be able to use cdrecord to burn data to cd's so that all the front-ends to cdrecord will work. It's much nicer than memorizing mkisofs commandline switches :-) What functionality is lost by this ability? > > > So here's my vote for a quick commit. > > > > No. See below. There are still problems with it. > > I'll quit the ATA/ATAPI development/maintenance if this goes in quickly. > There are alot of issues here that needs solutions. It will need a > *serious* maintainer that handles all aspects of it, especially > dealing with error reports for one thing, technically it needs > to be brought to a state where it works on alot more HW that seems > to be the case for now, and the integration into the ATA driver > should be dealt with a bit differently. > If it has so many problems... why not just clean it up? Just curious... Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message