From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 04:16:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E0D16A468 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@kajs.co.nz) Received: from mx1.orcon.net.nz (loadbalancer1.orcon.net.nz [219.88.242.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB65F13C455 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@kajs.co.nz) Received: from Debian-exim by mx1.orcon.net.nz with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I31Yl-00006k-V6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:17:43 +1200 Received: from [60.234.135.124] (helo=jbox.spinningplanet.co.nz) by mx1.orcon.net.nz with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I31Yl-00006B-N1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:17:43 +1200 Message-ID: <46808556.5050609@kajs.co.nz> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:17:42 +1200 From: Josh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070626) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <467F8461.1080104@kajs.co.nz> <20070625155311.GA28294@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <44wsxrkj3p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44wsxrkj3p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Check: by mx1.orcon.net.nz on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:17:43 +1200 X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Jun 26 15:17:43 2007 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5455 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 121 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Permanent apache patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:16:59 -0000 This seems to be the case... with csup at least... I would imagine portsnap might bust it though. Thanks :) Lowell Gilbert wrote: Roland Smith [1] writes: Unfortunately most port update tools will delete files that are not in the master tree. In the cases I know of, this will only happen if the same tool had previously known about the file. So just make sure you don't use a filename that was ever in the tree in that particular directory. References 1. mailto:rsmith@xs4all.nl