From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 16 18:10:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD7106564A; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82D08FC16; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [80.73.162.239] [80.73.162.239:44119] (HELO/EHLO luna.dio.ru, authenticated with PLAIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id o5GIADm9066633 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:10:14 +0400 (MSD) From: Max Brazhnikov To: Anonymous Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:10:15 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.4.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201006141228.o5ECSADC004581@repoman.freebsd.org> <86sk4msvtj.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86sk4msvtj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006162210.15931.makc@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:10:14 +0400 (MSD) Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/stumpwm Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:10:19 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:59:04 +0400, Anonymous wrote: > Max Brazhnikov writes: > > makc 2010-06-14 12:28:10 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > x11-wm/stumpwm Makefile > > > > Log: > > Build with lang/sbcl by default, clisp lacks x11 module > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.8 +1 -1 ports/x11-wm/stumpwm/Makefile > > I think PORTREVISION should be bumped, too. This case matches one in > Porter's Handbook: > > Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: > - Changes to the port Makefile to enable or disable compile-time > options in the package. > The port failed to build before fix, no need for rising PORTREVISION in this case.