From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 19:45:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA3437B401; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from digger1.defence.gov.au (digger1.defence.gov.au [203.5.217.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86A143FBD; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:45:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Alex.Wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from dsto-ms2.dsto.defence.gov.au (dsto-ms2.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.2.150]) by digger1.defence.gov.au with ESMTP id h3M2k27U001752; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:16:02 +0930 (CST) Received: from muttley.dsto.defence.gov.au (unverified) by dsto-ms2.dsto.defence.gov.au ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:15:18 +0930 Received: from ednex501.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednex501.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.2.81])h3M2a5h24283; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:06:05 +0930 (CST) Received: from squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au ([131.185.75.211]) by ednex501.dsto.defence.gov.au with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 28HC8HNT; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:06:05 +0930 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:06:08 +0930 (CST) From: "Wilkinson,Alex" X-X-Sender: wilkinsa@squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au To: Terry Lambert In-Reply-To: <3EA4946F.DBF7B2CC@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20030422120346.L54751@squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au> References: <3EA4946F.DBF7B2CC@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: Robert Watson cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: HEADS UP: UFS2 now the default creation type on 5.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex.Wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:45:44 -0000 Thanks for that. Do you know if UFS2 dynamically allocates inodes ? - aW http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2003/04/02/0005.html ...so read the UFS1 paper, and everywhere it talks about "32bit block offset", mentally substitute "64bit block offset".