From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 10 08:37:32 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2208D1;
 Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:37:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from andrew@fubar.geek.nz)
Received: from nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (nibbler.fubar.geek.nz [199.48.134.198])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9CE2447;
 Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:37:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bender.Home (97e5e46b.skybroadband.com [151.229.228.107])
 by nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 927E45DFFE;
 Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:37:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:37:24 +0100
From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>
To: d@delphij.net
Subject: Re: armv6eb broken?
Message-ID: <20130910093724.2be6332c@bender.Home>
In-Reply-To: <522E47B1.2070904@delphij.net>
References: <522E47B1.2070904@delphij.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:37:32 -0000

On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:12:01 -0700
Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that 'make tinderbox' is still broken for armv6eb, citing
> missing __sync_fetch_and_add_4 referenced in librt.so.  I have no idea
> on how to fix this though :-/

My opinion is we should remove the armv6eb target. It was unsupported
by llvm & clang the last time I looked, and, as far as I can tell, we
have no boards that use it.

Andrew