From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 17 03:15:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18273106566B for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 03:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E667A8FC15 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 03:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5EF085619E; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:15:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:15:06 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Xin LI Message-ID: <20111217031506.GA6234@lonesome.com> References: <20111217002404.GA70926@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl Subject: Re: [PATCH] lang/gcc -- Fix build on freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 03:15:07 -0000 On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:09:08PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: > Actually you can add a dot (.) to these matches, e.g. freebsd[123]* -> > freebsd[123].*, etc... Have you contacted the maintainer > (gerald@FreeBSD.org) by the way? My guess? We should rip out the [123] and [23] strings entirely. If anyone is running ports on FreeBSD 1, they have more problems than they can count right now. I can personally guarantee that ports don't work on 4.x (I ripped out the compat code several years ago that dealt with gross old make(1) bugs, etc.) and I think that means not 3.x either. In any case, the official claim is that the Ports Collection only supports 789 as first- class citizens right now, not anything older. mcl