From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 20:59:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C79416A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:59:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns8.vianetworks.com.ar (ns8.via-net-works.net.ar [200.61.12.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D6C143D48 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hnunez@vianetworks.com.ar) Received: (qmail 42919 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2005 17:59:45 -0300 Received: from valkyria.via-net-works.net.ar (nunezh@200.61.12.50) by ns8.vianetworks.com.ar with SMTP; 17 Mar 2005 17:59:45 -0300 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:59:46 -0300 From: Hernan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nu=F1ez?= To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050317175946.019816ab@valkyria.via-net-works.net.ar> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Vianetworks - Velocom - Winstar X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: BIND problem, a bad delegation or both of them ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:59:46 -0000 Our DNS is having a problem trying to resolve some domains, and I'm wonder= ing if anybody saw anything like that.=20 As the RFC 2181, section 10.3 said, a RR mustn't be an alias. So in my opi= nion ther is the problem why bind dosen't retrieve any information of this = domain. dig @localhost ns mediabusiness.tv ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @localhost ns mediabusiness.tv=20 ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 39733 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; mediabusiness.tv, type =3D NS, class =3D IN ;; Total query time: 1 msec ;; FROM: my.server. to SERVER: 127.0.0.1 ;; WHEN: Thu Mar 17 17:28:30 2005 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 34 rcvd: 34 Bind Debug Level 3=20 ------------------ req: nlookup(mediabusiness.tv) id 61851 type=3D15 class=3D1 req: found 'mediabusiness.tv' as 'mediabusiness.tv' (cname=3D0) wanted(0x9011420, IN MX) [IN NS] =20 wanted(0x90113f0, IN MX) [IN NS] findns: 2 NS's added for 'mediabusiness' ns_forw() find_zone(mediabusiness.tv, 1) find_zone: unknown zone find_zone(tv, 1) find_zone: unknown zone find_zone(., 1) find_zone: existing zone 1 nslookup(nsp=3D0xbfbfdb38, qp=3D0x8693000, "mediabusiness.tv", d=3D0) nslookup: NS "NS1.SENIC.BIZ" c=3D1 t=3D2 (flags 0x2) < NS 'NS1.SENIC.BIZ' NS points to CNAME < BAD nslookup: NS "NS2.SENIC.BIZ" c=3D1 t=3D2 (flags 0x2) < DELEGATION ? NS 'NS2.SENIC.BIZ' NS points to CNAME < nslookup: 0 ns addrs total forw: nslookup reports danger ns_freeqry(0x8693000) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I collected the NS of mediabusiness.tv from whois.networksolutions.com dat= abase. whois -h whois.networksolutions.com mediabusiness.tv Whois Server Version 1.0 Domain names can now be registered with many different competing registrars. Go to http://registrar.verisign-grs.com/whois/ for detailed information. Domain Name: MEDIABUSINESS.TV Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Name Server: NS1.SENIC.BIZ Name Server: NS2.SENIC.BIZ Status: CLIENT-XFER-PROHIBITED Updated Date: 22-dec-2004 Creation Date: 20-jan-2004 Expiration Date: 20-jan-2006 Domain servers in listed order: NS1.SENIC.BIZ 67.18.31.242 NS2.SENIC.BIZ 67.18.31.243 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Then, I did the followning query 'dig @67.18.31.242 NS1.SENIC.BIZ'. So, I = confirmed that this RR was delegated as aliases. dig @67.18.31.242 NS1.SENIC.BIZ ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @67.18.31.242 NS1.SENIC.BIZ=20 ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2178 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 8, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; NS1.SENIC.BIZ, type =3D A, class =3D IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. NS1.SENIC.BIZ. 4H IN CNAME NS1.SENIC.BIZ. ;; Total query time: 161 msec ;; FROM: ns1.via-net-works.net.ar to SERVER: 67.18.31.242 ;; WHEN: Thu Mar 17 17:26:31 2005 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 31 rcvd: 143 At last, I wonder if BIND must behave like RFC 2181 said and just claim to= NETWORK SOLUTIONS or what ? . Well any coment about it will be apreciated. ------------------------------------------------- Lic. Hernan Nu=F1ez =20 Un*x System Administrator=20 Velocom Argentina - Datco Tecnolog=EDa y Operaciones | DDI +54 11 4316-1400 -------------------------------------------------