Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:00:32 -0600
From:      "Jay West" <jwest@ezwind.net>
To:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Roger_Pau_Monn=E9'?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc:        freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: misc. questions
Message-ID:  <000801ce1b3c$223a5900$66af0b00$@ezwind.net>
In-Reply-To: <513851F1.8080009@citrix.com>
References:  <000901ce1aa7$90704320$b150c960$@ezwind.net> <op.wtjkuquy34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> <000601ce1aed$97e06540$c7a12fc0$@ezwind.net> <513851F1.8080009@citrix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It was written....
>I think there were several fixes for the RTC clock recently, so trying the
Xen 4.2 branch might bring some improvements.
I'm using Citrix Xenserver 6.1, so stuff from the Xen 4.2 branch isn't
available for me....

>Also, it is possible to use the PV clock from HVM (PVHVM) domains, which
will probably bring better stability. I'm going to look into this when I
have some spare cycles.
That I would very much like to know how to do so that I can give it a shot.

J






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801ce1b3c$223a5900$66af0b00$>