Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:30:39 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Shell -e behaviour Message-ID: <20050422153039.GA18154@stack.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi. I know that it's no sinecure to change the behaviour of /bin/sh bacause of the impact on all kinds of scripts written for it and that's probably why there are so many differences between shell implemetations floating around. I gathered some info about some of the differences on http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/sh-e.html and wondered what way FreeBSD's /bin/sh was going in FreeBSD 6.x/7.x in this specific department... Any comments on how the POSIX standard should be interpreted ? Marc --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCaRifezjnobFOgrERAsyDAKCQRho3t46NtMvTnzYWZPyxU41adACfffwK HdPuCnMz+rhhfA6KAWJ0tss= =Ieg/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050422153039.GA18154>