From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 3 16:28:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA04012 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 16:28:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04006 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 16:28:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (sjx-ca126-03.ix.netcom.com [207.92.177.195]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA27654; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 16:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id QAA21829; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 16:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 16:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807032327.QAA21829@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: freebsd@atipa.com CC: dannyman@dannyland.org, doconnor@gsoft.com.au, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Atipa on Fri, 3 Jul 1998 16:04:57 -0600 (MDT)) Subject: Re: New ports scheme From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Guys, I appreciate your feedback but really there is no way we are moving away from our directory structure at this point. It will simply be too hard for the committers, and we are not even close to approaching the limit of what the current framework can handle (at least structure wise -- personnel wise, that's a different question). Can we put an end to this discussion now? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message