From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 19:38:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC8F16A4CF for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:38:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3C243D49 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:38:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA8245150C; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:39:07 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Josh Hansen Message-ID: <20041004193907.GA94265@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1096915733.41619b153c86a@webmail.inf.ufrgs.br> <20041004145927.74ad8b47.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4161A218.6060506@josh.aros.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4161A218.6060506@josh.aros.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran cc: regi@inf.ufrgs.br Subject: Re: C compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 19:38:00 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0600, Josh Hansen wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: >=20 > >regi@inf.ufrgs.br wrote: > > > >=20 > > > >>Hello, > >> > >>I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own > >>programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that > >>FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compi= led > >>to linux. I checked several compile options, but it did not have good= =20 > >>results. > >> =20 > >> > > > >5.2.1 is not a strong performer. It's ALPHA code. > > > >If you want to do performance testing, either use 4.10, or work with the > >5.3 BETAs. 5.2.1 isn't supposed to be fast yet. > > > >=20 > > > I really don't think the problem is that simple. How about either=20 > giving him a real answer or none at all? It's hard to give a good answer to a bad question :) In order to accurately diagnose the problem we need a way to repeat it, or at least a full description of what was tried (including source code and details of the benchmark measurements). Otherwise, all we can do is guess what might be going on. Kris =20 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBYabbWry0BWjoQKURAlMBAKCKW5cfmkVUoXO+BnWvQ4QsShDkJQCdGCPr lsNS3y5B8Fs/PneWmeh2t3I= =mRtv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--