From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 4 12:30:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA27797 for current-outgoing; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 12:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA27790 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 12:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0u4vfP-0003wjC; Thu, 4 Apr 96 12:30 PST Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA00449; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 20:29:58 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Nice Firewall :-) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Apr 1996 12:26:07 PST." <199604042026.MAA24533@multivac.orthanc.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 20:29:57 +0000 Message-ID: <447.828649797@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >>>>> "Poul-Henning" == Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > Poul-Henning> If you had paid attention to the mailinglists, you > Poul-Henning> would have known that ipfw was changed to a default > Poul-Henning> policy of deny some time back. > > Yes yes. The surprise was the -1 return from sendto(). This was not > consistent with the old behaviour of just swallowing the packet. I > don't remember this being mentioned on the list. I have not definitively decided on that point. I think ENOACCES is a good idea but it may break too many things. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.