From owner-freebsd-java Mon Feb 3 14:43:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBB837B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp01.web.de [217.72.192.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD8A43E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:43:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from g.w.k@web.de) Received: from [217.232.164.149] (helo=pD9E8A495.dip.t-dialin.net) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE(Exim) 4.93 #1) id 18fpIR-0003xq-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 23:42:36 +0100 Subject: Re: jdk 1.4.1 patchset2 is coming ... From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" To: Alexey Zelkin Cc: Max Khon , freebsd-java@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030203213233.A72514@phantom.cris.net> References: <20030203134010.A69472@phantom.cris.net> <20030204012148.A23926@iclub.nsu.ru> <20030203213233.A72514@phantom.cris.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 03 Feb 2003 23:43:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1044312220.281.15.camel@bat.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What does this mean for the -current branch? Has the libc_r stuff been included in 5.0-R, or will I need to CVSup to current -current? -- Regards, Georg. P.S.: Hey guys I am just upgrading my -stable system to 5.0-R *because* JDK1.4 was reported not to run well on -stable. Now you announce you have done all further porting work on -stable and only lightly tested on -current. Grumble. A while earlier, last year, I ran -current because billh did all of his HotSpot work on -current. Then I converted to -stable as life in -current became too hot (too much work, I mean) to me and as the libc_r patches for HotSpot had been backported. I feel like chasing a permanent current-stable-current-stable spiral of Java development in FreeBSD. Shouldn't we all agree on *one* primary os branch for Java, announce that, and stick with it? -- Regards again, Georg. Am Mo, 2003-02-03 um 20.32 schrieb Alexey Zelkin: > hi, > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:21:49AM +0600, Max Khon wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:40:10PM +0200, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > > > > KEEP IN MIND: 1.4.1-p2 depends on version of pthread_attr_get_np() function > > > functionality which hit tree very recently. You'll need to update your > > > libc_r with patch distributed along with 1.4.1-p2 before start to build > > > and use (or cvsup/update your system to 04-Feb-2003 state) > > > > 04 Jan 2003, actually > > No. I actually meant today or later. I.e. accounting my today's commit > to libc_r). JVM/1.4.1 heavily depend on functionality added in this commit. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message