From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 23 09:45:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA09369
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA09362
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA21283; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Curio 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:08:34 MDT."
             <199608231508.JAA06728@rocky.mt.sri.com> 
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:42:22 -0700
Message-ID: <21281.840818542@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Except that if we do it at the same time 'make' isn't smart enough to
> pick up the dependencies from the .depend file.  However, I'm not *real*

Shouldn't need to anyway since the tree's already clean, as you say.
I think the depend stage is run more for its side-effect of being
able to build stuff that's changed *after* the make world, and in that
respect it's probably worth keeping.

						Jordan