From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 15 09:40:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFD3106566C for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4838FC1A for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1F9e2so092105 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1F9e2ka092104; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:40:02 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201002150940.o1F9e2ka092104@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Andrew Reilly Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFB21065672 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B99E8FC12 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.161.100]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100215093220.ITBK1835.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:32:20 +0000 Received: from duncan.reilly.home ([124.188.161.100]) by nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100215093219.NWKA1978.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@duncan.reilly.home> for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:32:19 +0000 Message-Id: <1266226339.43070@duncan.reilly.home> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:32:19 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: Subject: bin/143949: system unzip pickiness unhelpful for OpenOffice build X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrew Reilly List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:40:03 -0000 >Number: 143949 >Category: bin >Synopsis: system unzip pickiness unhelpful for OpenOffice build >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 15 09:40:02 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Andrew Reilly >Release: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD duncan.reilly.home 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sat Feb 13 14:33:31 EST 2010 root@duncan.reilly.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DUNCAN amd64 >Description: Building port editors/openoffice-3 just now, it stops, unhelpfully telling one to build --from odk. Figuring out how to do that reveals that it really failed like this: /usr/local/bin/gcp /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/jurt_src.zip ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_src.zip cd ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/java_src && unzip -quo jurt_src.zip unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_src.zip' dmake: '../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_src.zip' removed. This looks as though unzip is unhappy with the combination of flags used, above. >How-To-Repeat: Just trying to make in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3 works every time, for me. >Fix: Moving /usr/bin/unzip asside so that the build sees /usr/local/bin/unzip is enough to allow the build to proceed. It's possible that this problem could be re-phrased as a ports bug against ooo, os that unzip doesn't get called with a contradictory set of arguments, but it's probably safer if our internal version just does the right thing. (at least as defined by this example.) >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: