From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 8 20:46:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3AD16A420; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3AB43D45; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:46:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.10.3.185] ([69.15.205.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k28KkaV0021603; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:46:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <440F42A6.7000600@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:46:30 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <1539.1141850573@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <1539.1141850573@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov , Kris Kennaway , Tor Egge Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_lookup.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:46:45 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <440F3FAA.5090804@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes: > > >>The only way to effectively avoid the problem would be to teach UFS to >>completely ignore the '.snap' directory entry when doing a readdir and >>lookup. That is not the same as what is being discussed with having a >>special hiiden hint flag. > > > Wouldn't that make it somewhat hard to actually access the snapshots ? > Sorry, I meant that the dirent would be surpressed from normal lookups and readdirs just just while it's unsafe to access it. Scott