From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug  2 04:13:56 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0439BD;
 Sat,  2 Aug 2014 04:13:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9662495;
 Sat,  2 Aug 2014 04:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local
 (ppp121-45-253-202.lns20.per2.internode.on.net [121.45.253.202])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s724Dh8b032311
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Fri, 1 Aug 2014 21:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <53DC6571.1080202@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:13:37 +0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: krad <kraduk@gmail.com>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
References: <53C706C9.6090506@com.jkkn.dk>
 <6326AB9D-C19A-434B-9681-380486C037E2@lastsummer.de>
 <53CB4736.90809@bluerosetech.com>
 <201407200939020335.0017641F@smtp.24cl.home>
 <788274E2-7D66-45D9-89F6-81E8C2615D14@lastsummer.de>
 <201407201230590265.00B479C4@smtp.24cl.home>
 <20140729103512.GC89995@FreeBSD.org>
 <53DA304E.6020105@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
 <20140731134147.GH2402@glebius.int.ru>
 <CALfReyerXQm6ehhtKXcJ9XD5fr=0LBShtD8EAUjd9p07xcQvjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALfReyerXQm6ehhtKXcJ9XD5fr=0LBShtD8EAUjd9p07xcQvjw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 04:13:56 -0000

On 8/1/14, 3:39 PM, krad wrote:
> I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf.
> Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably
> give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now
since ipfw now has a 'nat' keyword you might say that is has changed 
in that 10 years.
>