Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:31:48 +0300
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        Chris <rip@overflow.no>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Subject:   Re: [fbsd] Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <20060609233148.GA88285@gothmog.pc>
In-Reply-To: <4489DCAE.3070005@overflow.no>
References:  <20060526153422.GB25953@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060609095751.GI1273@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <4489DCAE.3070005@overflow.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-06-09 16:40, Chris <rip@overflow.no> wrote:
>Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:34:22PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> first sorry for cross-posting but I thought this patch might interest
>>> -CURRENT users as well as people concerned by security.
>>>
>>> I wrote a patch that integrates ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD, one step
>>> further than it has been realized so far.
>>>
>>> It is available here :
>>>     http://tataz.chchile.org/~tataz/FreeBSD/SSP/
>>
>> Hi list,
>> I haven't got much feedback so far.  I would be glad if any people
>> who have been using this patch told be if they have been faced with
>> some problems.
>[...]
> I'm using it successfuly with the stackp-gap and the random mmap
> on 6.1-RELEASE. No problems at all really :) Except that i want a nob
> for gcc to use the protection by default. We discussed this in another
> email.

You can always use `/etc/make.conf' to set it globally, right?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060609233148.GA88285>