From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 21:11:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053BC16A49E for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4D1449C1 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-129-213.51-151.net24.it [151.51.213.129]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k63LKbKH072379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:20:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.7/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k63L9m3d099432; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:09:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <44A987F2.2060906@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:11:14 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060605) MIME-Version: 1.0 Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44A7A0B8.8050109@netfence.it> <44bqs6n9c2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44bqs6n9c2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: Snapshot problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:11:31 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> I believe the first one is a known problem, any more info? >> >> Any hint on the second? > > Not really; seems strange. > > Are you able to fsck the snapshot? Hm... guess so. Is it "fsck /var/local/snapmnt"? Just a question before I try it... this is a production system, will it screw up anything? bye & Thanks av.