Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:52:09 -0800 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>, "FreeBSD. org clusteradm" <clusteradm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Testing a VIMAGE enabled kernel in the FreeBSD cluster Message-ID: <CAG=rPVfU=vvpJ2D2ENJQeEs-5sLcgBSiW7gY2V0b6xEqExQ%2B1w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2848643.zmWNn4zKep@overcee.wemm.org> References: <CAG=rPVcf7xJeUFXRFi5bMAYw4pF_nkoA1fDSyG8iGYt6VJE7pA@mail.gmail.com> <2848643.zmWNn4zKep@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote: > On Thursday, November 20, 2014 12:27:46 AM Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I submitted this RFC to enable VIMAGE in the GENERIC kernel config > > on January 5, 2015: > > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2014-November/016282.html > > > > I'm not receiving any major opposition from the idea. > > > > It's a tight schedule, but what is the possibility that we could upgrade > > one of the PF firewalls with a VIMAGE kernel sometime in the next 6 > weeks, > > and test this out. I would be interested in testing the following, > > *not* in a vnet jail, on bare metail: > > > > (1) the PF ruleset in the FreeBSD cluster > > (2) IPv6 > > (3) any other heavy duty network-y stuff that the FreeBSD cluster uses, > > which may not have been heavily tested by developers. > > We have another problem to solve first. IPv6 doesn't work on the firewalls > sometime after Oct 3rd and they were rolled back after the refresh failed > spectacularly. > > Just to be clear though, you're asking for 'options VIMAGE' with no other > changes, right? > Yes, that's right. -- Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG=rPVfU=vvpJ2D2ENJQeEs-5sLcgBSiW7gY2V0b6xEqExQ%2B1w>