From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 17:07:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBE61065675 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zachary.loafman@isilon.com) Received: from seaxch09.isilon.com (seaxch09.isilon.com [74.85.160.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F3E8FC12 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zachary.loafman@isilon.com) Received: from zloafman.west.isilon.com ([10.54.190.57]) by seaxch09.isilon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:55:28 -0700 Received: from zloafman.west.isilon.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zloafman.west.isilon.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m54GtR4T021572; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:55:28 -0700 Received: (from zloafman@localhost) by zloafman.west.isilon.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id m54GtRvG021571; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:55:27 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: zloafman.west.isilon.com: zloafman set sender to zachary.loafman@isilon.com using -f Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:55:27 -0700 From: Zachary Loafman To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20080604165527.GC31784@zloafman.west.isilon.com> References: <20080603164503.GC1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <20080603181505.GF1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2008 16:55:28.0267 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA91BDB0:01C8C663] Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion documentation for the FreeBSD project? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:07:29 -0000 On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:21:09AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > So, I foolishly volunteered to do an evolutionary step and make the > ``uninspired'' choice. I know svn can work for us. We don't have to > deal with the whole workflow model at the same time. Thanks for all your work. I think you made the right choice, and the only way this was going to get done was if someone actually devoted the time to do it. As a vendor that runs svn internally, I think the switch should help. We're still trying to figure out how best to mirror parts of the FreeBSD svn repo into our own, but I think this should ease parts of our merge pain going forward. -- Zach Loafman | Staff Engineer | Isilon Systems