From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 29 19:45:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from inet.chip-web.com (c1003518-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [24.1.82.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27C3114D07 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:45:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ludwigp@bigfoot.com) Received: (qmail 2555 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 03:45:36 -0000 Received: from speedy.chip-web.com (HELO speedy) (172.16.1.1) by inet.chip-web.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 03:45:36 -0000 Message-Id: <4.1.19990329194357.009ed450@mail-r> X-Sender: ludwigp2@mail-r X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:45:32 -0800 To: Forrest Aldrich , Greg Pavelcak From: Ludwig Pummer Subject: Re: Too old for bsd.port.mk? Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990329223913.00971e60@206.25.93.69> References: <19990329214611.A17800@oitunix.oit.umass.edu> <4.1.19990329182400.00a6f990@mail-r> <4.1.19990329190607.00a743c0@216.67.14.69> <4.1.19990329182400.00a6f990@mail-r> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 07:39 PM 3/29/99 , Forrest Aldrich wrote: >At 09:46 PM 3/29/99 -0500, Greg Pavelcak wrote: >>Why should he have to immediately following a make world? >> >>Greg >[ ... ] > >My thoughts exactly. I would presume that a fresh cvsup and >then make world (buildworld/installworld) would take care of this. >Why the different approach? You neglected to mention your FreeBSD version in the original post to the list. The 2.x branch no longer has to be supported by the ports maintainers. Now is probably when the lack of maintenance finally resulted in ports that would no longer build. --Ludwig Pummer ( ludwigp@bigfoot.com ) ICQ UIN: 692441 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message