From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 00:00:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CFE28B for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E11C3278 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7P00fAi073906 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hiren@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #12 from Hiren Panchasara --- Tried to follow the rabbit-hole to see where rate is coming from: Index: if_iwn.c =================================================================== --- if_iwn.c (revision 269621) +++ if_iwn.c (working copy) @@ -4281,6 +4281,8 @@ rate = ni->ni_txrate; } + DPRINTF(sc, IWN_DEBUG_XMIT, "tx rate is: %d in %s \n", rate, __func__); + /* Encrypt the frame if need be. */ if (wh->i_fc[1] & IEEE80211_FC1_PROTECTED) { /* Retrieve key for TX. */ via this codepath: ieee80211_set_basic_htrates() ieee80211_add_htinfo_body() amrr_rate() .ir_rate ieee80211_ratectl_rate() iwn_tx_data() In the logs, I get: Aug 24 16:59:35 flymockour-l7 kernel: tx rate is: 128 in iwn_tx_data Which I think is: 807 #define IEEE80211_RATE_BASIC 0x80 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.