From owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 29 15:40:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2DBC016A4CE; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:40:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B634543D45; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:39:59 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.253])
	by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7TFdxWh046388;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7TFdxoK022346;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel@dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: (from marcel@localhost)
	by dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i7TFdxmQ022345;
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcel)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:39:59 -0700
From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040829153959.GA22248@dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net>
References: <20040829091547.927B07303F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<20040829143543.GX30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
	<20040829145603.GG23120@ip.net.ua>
	<20040829145919.GY30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040829145919.GY30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
cc: ia64@freebsd.org
cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tinderbox reports, responses, and meta-comments
	<freebsd-tinderbox.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-tinderbox>,
	<mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-tinderbox>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-tinderbox>,
	<mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:40:00 -0000

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 04:59:19PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> +> > 
> +> I believe it's -O2 (which is not in default CFLAGS).
> 
> Nope, it was tested with -O2. I made such breakage before, I think, and
> it was only exposed on non-i386 archs, AFAIR. Why? Where is the difference?

In the compiler. Different code transformations at different times
and to different extend can create different warnings. The uninitialized
variable is probably the most affected warning due to this.

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net