From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed May 12 15:36:44 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from area51.fremont.ca.us (d60-076.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.76])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC165153C4
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 May 1999 15:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us)
Received: (from mharo@localhost)
	by area51.fremont.ca.us (8.9.2/8.9.2) id PAA75055;
	Wed, 12 May 1999 15:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mharo)
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 15:36:38 -0700
From: Michael Haro <mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us>
To: Johan Dalstrom <jd@c64.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Build of /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12
Message-ID: <19990512153638.A75030@area51.fremont.ca.us>
References: <19990512234917.A92549@fx.c64.org> <19990513003347.A93169@fx.c64.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <19990513003347.A93169@fx.c64.org>; from Johan Dalstrom on Thu, May 13, 1999 at 12:33:47AM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

bsd.port.mk was update because perl5 was updated in -current.
perl5 in 3.1-stable/beta/whatever_you_call_it is still at
5.00502 AFAIK.

As for the perl5 port, I don't know.

Michael

On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Johan Dalstrom wrote:
> Okay,            
> 
> PERL_VERSION=   5.00503
> 
> but why isn't the ports-tree uppgraded?
> Is there any special reason for upgrading bsd.port.mk
> and not /usr/ports/lang/perl5?
> 
> And as I see it, it would be better to install via ports
> than installing by hand, because of the package-checking..
> Am I wrong?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message