From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 03:02:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E1516A401 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B895513C46B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOmQ3-000J9S-1h for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:02:31 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2732Jas040761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2732JDs005840 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2732IUx005839 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:02:18 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070307030218.GP10453@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <45EDE0C5.1010305@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EDE0C5.1010305@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 6dc4245230f22f3abb357b69a6da667e X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 843 [Mar 06 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Subject: Re: LOR #193 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:02:33 -0000 --LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. >=20 > I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running=20 > gmirror and SMP if that matters). >=20 > With reference to your question on=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/031048.ht= ml: >=20 > >What application you run that triggers the LOR ?=20 >=20 > Bacula, I guess. > I'm taking filesystem snapshots, running the backup job and deleting the= =20 > snapshots. > In fact I've always seen some problems with some files in the snapshots= =20 > not being accessible to bacula-fd. >=20 > In a previous (quite old) thread it was in fact suggested I might be=20 > seeing some LOR, but only recently I activated all the debugging stuff. The (usual) consequence of the LOR is lock up. >=20 > What's the risk of running the suggested patch on a (quite critical)=20 > production server? It shall be safe unless you run filesystems compiled as modules, that where not built against patched kernel (patch changes the kernel binary interface). >=20 > BTW: Sometimes, upon reboot, delayed fscks start and say that the=20 > filesystem cannot be fixed with -p and I should run a full fsck. If I=20 > reboot in single user mode and run a full fsck, it will find no errors. >=20 > Also, I have a couple of other boxes on which I run bacula this way and= =20 > I never experienced this problem: they are respectively i386/gmirror/UP= =20 > and amd64/hardware RAID/SMP; so, might the combination of amd64/gmirror= =20 > or gmirror/SMP be in the way? I doubt that gmirror could affect this. --LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF7is5C3+MBN1Mb4gRAg/VAJ4qVA+YIxdjjtQMkQb0vYY0JC4bygCfSJA+ 52CqP1chn1sFmd6pNoEMfrU= =P9Y4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LwbuP8dfxhLLLUfV--