Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 14:03:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM> To: terry@lambert.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why so many ways to stay in sync? Message-ID: <199605141903.OAA26582@compound.Think.COM> In-Reply-To: <199605141809.LAA12701@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Tue, 14 May 1996 11:09:09 -0700 (MST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 11:09:09 -0700 (MST) > > Doesn't ctm obsolete sup? Doesn't Usenet obsolere email? The closer analogy would be "Doesn't email obsolete Usenet?". But it still would not be apposite, for ctm deltas are delivered by ftp *or* by email, so that ctm subsumes both of the analogous roles. "Could not a form of email which offer both push and pull access modes obsolete Usenet?" I think it could, all other things being equal, were my mail categorized automatically and the availability of all selective modes of content selection insured.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605141903.OAA26582>