From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 20 05:12:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA26159 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 20 May 1998 05:12:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA26143 for ; Wed, 20 May 1998 05:12:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12406; Wed, 20 May 1998 12:12:30 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA05208; Wed, 20 May 1998 14:12:28 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980520141228.03211@follo.net> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:12:28 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Garrett Wollman , Luigi Rizzo Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: and again on forwarding... References: <199805191624.SAA09951@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> <199805192103.RAA21962@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199805192103.RAA21962@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Tue, May 19, 1998 at 05:03:24PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 19, 1998 at 05:03:24PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > It could be avoided by simply rewriting the IP input code to not munge > the IP header (and IP output to expect it to be munged). Easy enough > to do, but it's a pain to find all the clients which expect it to be > munged. Is that only clients in our kernel, or are there clients 'out there' which we'd have to care for, too? Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message