From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 19 20:18:44 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id UAA28046 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 20:18:44 -0800
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA28035 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 20:18:38 -0800
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA10071; Thu, 19 Jan 95 21:12:45 MST
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9501200412.AA10071@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: NETBEUI for FreeBSD? Any docs?
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 95 21:12:44 MST
Cc: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, osyjm@schizo.coe.montana.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <4125.790548958@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 19, 95 12:55:58 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> My problem with SAMBA is that it's not a DOS solution, just a Windows
> solution.  I need both.  Any suggestions? :)

LANMAN under DOS using a TCP/IP transport can use Samba.  As can
the Artisoft Lantastic DOS client, which can talk SMB.  AT&T LanManager
also does this, as does DEC's PathWorks products.

The default protocol for both of the former is NetBEUI.  The default for
both of the latter is proprietary (AT&T StarLan and DECNet Phase IV,
respectively).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.