From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 7 09:48:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA20420 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 09:48:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA20332 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 09:47:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xpekJ-0005wj-00; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 11:33:03 -0800 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 11:33:02 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: Capriotti cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SFT In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19980106141532.0068a330@pop.mpc.com.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Capriotti wrote: > Does anyone have any news about System Fault Tolerance under Free ? > > Like what Novell has, from mirrowed disks to mirrowed servers ? Mirrored disks can be done with ccd. Mirrored servers are basically what Unix types call a cluster. On Novell this is easy, because Novell boxes are basically just file servers, but a Unix box could be doing many different things. Migrating tasks from the failed system to the working system, and assumption of the IP traffic, is difficult. Tom