From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 13 20:13:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA55106564A; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0952F8FC0A; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so6451476obb.13 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:13:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MMQLoIb6wZcx8h4e7H/ZwSNWC/C2Dq3/tKD9UA9280I=; b=M+YWPq5StO9tDiPIOEAJyFEjhBRMyWAnWXVdBofSfdU1ZLpdRgk3CZDRNc9N4lPqjT J3EgOg4Jtf0gfWWd0J3V49DMUdH0gyIFx0lX3OlBhrw8fmDDdbVUCURjaKlz4DZJ89yL YA/DAImrDJIaLCs8KH43QvPPrdl1zKgrD0qu82Y/4eayhaY+/yCVt5rSONb6k7ILOYw9 Ta1P/+RjID88ckC1mT1WNA1QPVT4cwJJwl1zPK/pv2N08s85eHX98hHhtvXmuBxPZxoq ftfhuVsdAL5nGZ/hEs0F+5xFoXH3lzPqDfCx5EtoIvG+Y9wyyflmRGicYjf5rZSNtqol dByA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.174.100 with SMTP id br4mr487418obc.62.1347567217264; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.142.201 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:13:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <505239E2.1040805@gmail.com> References: <6A0C3360-0A1E-4905-A33E-D6CC590D7A5A@bnc.net> <504E200A.5020604@gmail.com> <504E330A.4090806@FreeBSD.org> <504E9EB0.2040504@gmail.com> <505239E2.1040805@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:13:37 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: matt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Achim Patzner , Andrey Zonov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mfi driver performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:13:38 -0000 On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:54 PM, matt wrote: > On 09/10/12 19:31, Garrett Cooper wrote: ... > It seems hw.mfi.max_cmds is read only. The performance is pretty close to > expected with no nvram or bbu on this card and commodity disks from 1.5 > years ago, as far as I'm concerned. I'd love better write performance, but > it's probably being held back by the single platter in the mirror when it is > writing far from its edge. Try loader.conf: $ grep -r hw.mfi.max_cmds /sys/dev/mfi/ /sys/dev/mfi/mfi.c:TUNABLE_INT("hw.mfi.max_cmds", &mfi_max_cmds); Cheers, -Garrett