From owner-cvs-ports Tue Feb 25 18:07:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA05044 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA04901; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 18:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA27039; Wed, 26 Feb 97 03:08:11 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 03:08:11 +0100 Message-Id: <9702260208.AA27039@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> From: Jean-Marc Zucconi To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199702250924.BAA05797@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/latex/scripts configure ports/print/latex Makefile X-Mailer: Emacs Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> Satoshi Asami writes: > * Modified: print/latex Makefile > * Added: print/latex/scripts configure > * Log: > * Adapt to the new version of fetch. > Perhaps related to the tex failure, but this one doesn't package > either. No this is my fault :-(. I should always install/test my ports in empty directories.... > Satoshi > P.S. It seems like print/{tex,latex} is giving us a very high problem > rate, do we really need them now that teTeX is functional > (usually) and contains a full *TeX distribution? I don't know if many people use the tex/latex port. Of course, if nobody use it, we can remove it. On the other hand there is a big difference in size (because tetex has a lot of stuff). Jean-Marc _____________________________________________________________________________ Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr =============================================================================