Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:43:29 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: dougb@freebsd.org Cc: rank1seeker@gmail.com, sendtomatt@gmail.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change? Message-ID: <4f3ff151.FznGzC6RC0a5qBKx%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3EFB70.5000102@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAOjFWZ6WM1bLEwaBiUE50Gj4MrwxefDWFb85ecRtYkSDuZ0erg@mail.gmail.com> <mailpost.1329495670.7246668.67851.mailing.freebsd.hackers@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <4F3E8225.9030501@FreeBSD.org> <E1RyRKJ-000Ioa-Ec@hans3> <4F3E8C26.3080900@FreeBSD.org> <E1RyRq0-000Iqy-3l@hans3> <4F3EA5F2.9070804@gmail.com> <E1RyTZo-000J0R-0Y@hans3> <4F3EAE5F.6070903@gmail.com> <E1RyUv6-000J5e-0E@hans3> <20120217.220802.988.2@DOMY-PC> <4F3EDEBC.7040703@gmail.com> <4F3EFB70.5000102@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > loading modules through loader.conf is > veeeeeerrrrryyyyyy sssssllllloooooowwwwww ... Is it noticeably slower to load (say) a 6MB kernel + 2MB of modules than to load an 8MB kernel? If so, any idea why?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f3ff151.FznGzC6RC0a5qBKx%perryh>