From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Jun 13 01:02:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD82D880F6 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 01:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2882438 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 01:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id v5D127R9053950; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id v5D125Xm053949; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:02:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201706130102.v5D125Xm053949@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: VNC stuff In-Reply-To: <593F0D0C.6080901@omnilan.de> To: Harry Schmalzbauer Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:02:05 -0700 (PDT) CC: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 01:02:09 -0000 [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Bez?glich Zane C. B-H.'s Nachricht vom 12.06.2017 19:30 (localtime): > > On 2017-06-12 09:39, Peter Grehan wrote: > >> Hi Zane, > >> > >>> I assume that means the VNC/fbuf stuff as well? Not seeing that that > >>> currently in 11-STABLE. > >> > >> Sure you don't mean 10-STABLE ? The uefi graphics code was committed > >> 11 months ago: > >> > >> > >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/usr.sbin/bhyve/pci_fbuf.c?view=log > >> > > > > Hmm... interesting. Not seeing that at all mentioned in the man for > > bhyve. > > True. > MFCing r302504-317777 for usr.sbin/bhyve/bhyve.8 would document the > precious bhyve(8) development progress for upcoming 11.1 users. I think you meant r302504,r317777. r302504 is not likely to be MFC'ed at this time, this is the e1000 driver and man page. This code has known issues at this time and is an action item list on the bhyve developers work list. r317777 should be MFC'ed asap. Peter, could you please do an RFa to re@ to have R317777 MFC'ed? We have 3 days left before 11.1B2. If you want me to follow up on that just send me back a direct mentor approval and I'll do the RE and MFC work to get this in tree. If you think we should go ahead and pull the usable, but known problematic E1000 driver over mention that as well. Thanks, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org