From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 16 19:42:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0BF1C2 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB8912F2 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 1209190f-b7fb86d000000c36-1b-52af57b63e5a Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 0C.F5.03126.6B75FA25; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:42:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id rBGJgjVq004089; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:42:46 -0500 Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id rBGJghXm028666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:42:45 -0500 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id rBGJgh8V021061; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:42:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:42:43 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk X-X-Sender: kaduk@multics.mit.edu To: "Mike." Subject: Re: Typo in Example 19.1 in Handbook? In-Reply-To: <201312161045300400.056963DD@smtp.24cl.home> Message-ID: References: <201312161045300400.056963DD@smtp.24cl.home> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nrrstfH2QwZNWKYtTZ7pYLT5u+8Xi wOQx49N8Fo/Xs0oDmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Ms5uNy94zV5xaNUklgbGyWxdjJwcEgImEhPe T2aCsMUkLtxbDxTn4hASmM0k8WfzG2YIZyOjxIKjj6GcQ0wSRx6chXIaGCV2th5gBulnEdCW +LVvGSOIzSagJvF4bzMrxFxFic2nJoHViADZd47dBNvHLCAt0bB+M5gtLKAnsWXTM6BeDg5O AUuJI580QcK8Ao4Sd+dsADtVSMBCYuaN6WBjRAV0JFbvn8ICUSMocXLmExaIkZYS5/5cZ5vA KDQLSWoWktQCRqZVjLIpuVW6uYmZOcWpybrFyYl5ealFuiZ6uZkleqkppZsYQeHLKcm/g/Hb QaVDjAIcjEo8vDf71wUJsSaWFVfmHmKU5GBSEuWVDFwfJMSXlJ9SmZFYnBFfVJqTWnyIUYKD WUmE95YhUI43JbGyKrUoHyYlzcGiJM57k8M+SEggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCYrw8GhJMF7KgyoUbAo NT21Ii0zpwQhzcTBCTKcB2j4xlCQ4cUFibnFmekQ+VOMilLivLtAmgVAEhmleXC9sPTyilEc 6BVhXnWQKh5gaoLrfgU0mAlo8PM160AGlyQipKQaGLuqF044aFnz89PFabP+n62W5Df4Zfzp Vm9eatzG3oZ9y11Zph64MsVtA9PB02GffOVY7NNZltzr2GMq88xI2NH5UcwP1eaL1onBvBtv bDcWKoq+esryyCP5U1NXJVrwvvcRLZ3zqWlFGzdjmn8Xc83ZrwwZh7682q+/zfGFt8Jfy9KX /afOBSqxFGckGmoxFxUnAgAw4dwaCgMAAA== Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:42:48 -0000 On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Mike. wrote: > > > This example > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-glabel.html#idp80661168 > > > has the text > > "...Reboot the system, and at the loader(8) prompt, press 4 to > boot into single user mode. Then enter the following > commands:..." > > > I run FreeBSD 9.2, and the 'boot into single user mode' option > shows as #2 on the loader menu. Option #4 is 'Reboot'. > > Did the option numbering change since the example was written? > If the option numbering does chnage between releases, maybe the > mention of the option number should be removed and the option > text used instead. The numbering did change since that example was written, though I believe there is strong pressure to not repeat such a change. (The numbering change was part of a big rewrite in how the loader interface presented itself.) I will try to update the text to be correct for the current numbering scheme. Thanks for the report! -Ben Kaduk