From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 27 23:01:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D003106568D for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440B28FC15 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2ED2C50CC6; Thu, 28 May 2009 02:01:54 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:01:53 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20090528020153.24341832@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <01307982@ipt.ru> References: <4A1D6DB8.40209@bsdforen.de> <01307982@ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/jA/Mzcnq7ZfNsNcZQ/9xTx2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:01:27 -0000 --Sig_/jA/Mzcnq7ZfNsNcZQ/9xTx2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 28 May 2009 01:20:17 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: [ .. ] > > My preference would be to rely on 'pkg_info -g', but that would > > require all committers to run extensive checks before committing > > changes to the ports tree. Miwi has always done this and more than > > once revealed PLIST problems of my ports to me. But I wonder whether > > it is really sensible to ask committers to test everything on a > > Tinderbox (preferably on several platforms) before committing > > changes to the ports tree. =20 We do encourage this. The "preferably on several platforms" is problematic due to available resources we each have.=20 > Hm, ports with broken PLISTS are, well, broken. And should be fixed > or marked BROKEN. And they are. I'm actively marking them broken based on QAT. I can't do it instantly since some people require patting on the head ...=20 > I was sure that the FreeBSD packaging cluster does not produce > packages with broken plists (i.e. the package is not created). Is > that wrong? No, plist problems are hard errors. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/jA/Mzcnq7ZfNsNcZQ/9xTx2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkodxmEACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeX0XgCfYgFhkfICjAf0cmWlOcOUO5qA Nx4AoISgcl/abjI+vz7VgwEQs9Zdchy7 =dMal -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jA/Mzcnq7ZfNsNcZQ/9xTx2--