From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jul 10 02:28:29 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA02428
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 02:28:29 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA02422
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 02:28:12 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id TAA00454; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:11:26 +1000
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:11:26 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199507100911.TAA00454@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: peter@haywire.dialix.com, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches?
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>How about, as part of the sup scanning routines, the routine stamps in 
>the X.Y-DEVELOPMENT-yymmdd entrys into the freefall's 
>/usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh right before the supscan?

It has to be in the cvs commit scanning routines, since the distribution
mechanism (sup, ctm, ...) shouldn't affect the date.

Bruce