From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 00:43:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8947106566C for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 00:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@mawer.org) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF1C8FC0C for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 00:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so1200837pvc.13 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:43:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.108.9 with SMTP id k9mr6304884rvm.59.1273104734898; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.207.2 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 17:12:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BE1D7BF.70605@gmail.com> References: <4BE11114.5030306@gmail.com> <4BE1D7BF.70605@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:12:14 +1000 Message-ID: From: Antony Mawer To: Peter Palmreuther Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openjdk6 crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 00:43:53 -0000 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: > On 05.05.10 18:15, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> I see this comment near the assert: >> >> // Make sure the stack has at least enough depth to execute >> =A0 =A0 // the current bytecode. >> >> So possibly increasing the stack size could help? =A0Try -Xss2m or >> -Xss4m. =A0Though this could also be referring to an internal compiler >> stack and have nothing to do with the Java thread stack, so it may not >> matter at all. =A0Something that's easy to try at least. > > Tried and failed. See attached 'hs_err_pid83265.log'. Seems it's (as some= how > expected) the compiler stack, not the "normal" Java Stack?!? > > Anybody or anything else? > > I'd really like to have a mostly stable JRE/JDK running on my FreeBSD. Di= ablo > I was recommended to replace by OpenJDK, because it's not gonna be that > actively maintained OpenJDK is ... > > So what options exist for a stable up-to-date JDK6@FreeBSD8? I was running Tomcat under OpenJDK6 on FreeBSD 8.0/amd64, but experienced numerous difficulties with PDF generation using the iText library. The same setup running on a Linux system worked OK, and swapping OpenJDK out for Diablo also resolved the problems, so I wonder if there is still some things missing from the OpenJDK port that are included with Diablo...? --Antony