From owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 18:43:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1D916A41A for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com (smtpoutm.mac.com [17.148.16.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEB913C46B for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (asmtp006-s [10.150.69.69]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout008/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m1EIS99h023004; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:28:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mini-g4.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp006/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m1EIS7LB000512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:28:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Christian Kandeler In-Reply-To: <200802141452.24071.christian.kandeler@hob.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:28:06 -0800 References: <6C851D25-4B3A-4563-8363-C1BD9A14C1AC@mac.com> <200802141452.24071.christian.kandeler@hob.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Montecito: solved... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the IA-64 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:43:35 -0000 On Feb 14, 2008, at 5:52 AM, Christian Kandeler wrote: > On Wednesday 13 February 2008 20:15, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> I recently found some time again to play around with Montecito and >> the good news is that I have FreeBSD up and running!!! > > That /is/ good news, thank you! > >> The attached patch, which undoubtedly is a big kluge, works. >> I'll be working in the next couple of days/weeks to come up with >> a real solution... > > Will you incorporate this patch into a snapshot or are you going to > wait with that until the cleaner solution is there? Since the question exists, let me just commit what I have (but make it run-time dependent upon the processor) and merge it onto 7-STABLE... -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com